Legal Opinion

Ross v. Gallogly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1918No. 23,136Published

From Adams Circuit Court; David E. Smith, Judge. Action by Thomas M. Gallogly against Walter L. Ross, receiver of the Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad Company. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

— This action originated before a justice of the peace, where appellant defaulted and judgment was entered in favor of appellee. Appellant appealed from the judgment of the justice to the court below and filed a demurrer to the -complaint for want of facts, which was overruled. He then answered by a general denial. A trial by the court resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee and against appellant for $13. The *580overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial and the ruling of the court on the demurrer are here separately assigned as error. It appears from the complaint that on January 5,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Schultz v. AlterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. EbersoleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. ErdelIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Sneath Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API