Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of the Tolling Class, ECF No. 264. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for review.1 Upon consideration of the pleadings, facts and applicable law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary, Local Rule 105.6, and the Motion for Certification of the Tolling Class will be granted in part.
I. Background
As already summarized in this Court’s memorandum dated May 3, 2011 (May 3 Memo), this litigation arises out of
Plaintiffs theory that that Prosperity Mortgage Company…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thurman v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Childress v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Shongo v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023