Bayouth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
On a petition for rehearing it is earnestly urged that the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires that the judgment should be modified. We have again examined the record and are of the opinion that this contention is well founded.
The judgment (39 Okla. Cr. 8, 262 P. 702) is there fore modified to the extent of striking out the imprisonment assessed. The petition for rehearing is overruled. Mandate forthwith.
DOYLE, P. J., and DAVENPORT, !J., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bayouth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sukovaty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951