Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Helsabeck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1838PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

ihis was an. action ox assumpsit for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendant. Plea, nonassumpsit. The material facts of the case are, that Cooper purchased from Helsabeck a wagon, for - which he gave him five dollars in money, and an improvement he had made on the public lands, denominated by the parties a K congress improvement,” valued at 40 or SO dollars. The wagon was delivered to Cooper. Cooper left it under a shed at the defendant’s residence, by defendant’s permission, for safe-keeping. The defendant, aftelB^ms, converted the wagon to his own use. The wagon was proven to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Works v. DeCampIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Furry v. O'ConnorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Proctor v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Jones v. GreggIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API