Legal Opinion
Associated Flour Haulers & Warehousemen, Inc. v. Hoffman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1940PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The defendant-appellant has thus far failed in its challenge to the sufficiency of the complaint herein which comes to us for review by leave of the Appellate Division, upon the certified question: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Triborough Transportation Corp.? ”
The plaintiff is a membership corporation composed of twenty-three corporations, firms and individuals engaged in hauling flour in' the city of New York from storage depots, railroad terminals and steamships to customer-consignees. The hauling is done by motor trucks…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by32 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. AtlasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v. Interstate Wrecking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Herzfeld v. Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.