Alexander v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.
Austin Lee Alexander appeals a resen-tence order, severer than the original sentence order, which he contends deprives him of liberty without due process of law because the judge failed to adhere to a strict resentencing requirement established by the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). We affirm because 1) Pearce is inapplicable; and 2) the reasons enunciated by the judge for the harsher sentence indicate that the order does not violate appellant’s right to due process.
In 1980, a trial judge…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hyde v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Belger v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991
- Dix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982