Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Blanchard v. City Commissioners

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1988No. 9209PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRUMAN, Judge.

Respondents appeal from the trial court’s grant of a peremptory writ of mandamus and order granting attorney fees to petitioner. The issues are whether the trial court erred: (1) in holding that the case was not moot; (2) in denying respondents’ defense of failure to include necessary parties; and (3) in its interpretation and application of NMSA 1978, Sections 14-2-1 to -3 (Orig.Pamp. and Cum.Supp.1987). For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court.

I. BACKGROUND

The City of Clovis advertised for applicants for the position of city planner. Petitioner, editor of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Sanchez v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brantley Farms v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. City of Farmington v. Daily TimesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United Nuclear Corp. v. State ex rel. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Matter of Estate of GainesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Bradbury & Stamm Construction v. Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API