Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of Santa Fe

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1971No. 9014PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMANUS, Justice.

Defendant City of Santa Fe appeals from a declaratory judgment holding that certain subdivision regulations complained of by plaintiffs were unlawful and in violation of our State and Federal Constitutions.

It is undisputed that an enabling statute of the State of New Mexico was in force authorizing an ordinance regarding subdivision regulations. There was due adoption of the land subdivision regulations under said city ordinances. The portion of the Santa Fe City Ordinances pertinent hereto reads as follows:

“2. For lands being subdivided within . the corporate limits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Haugen v. GLEASONOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Marshall v. HillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Sandia Savings and Loan Association v. KleinheimNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Coronado Development Co. v. City of McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY CTY. v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Mowrer v. RuskNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Las Cruces v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Garcia v. Village of TijerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API