Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Reske

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 18, 1997No. 96-P-873Published

1DissentGillerman, J.

I have no doubt that there was larceny in the defendant’s heart as he rewrote the first sales contract and wrote up the remaining five contracts for Nellon to sign. But it is fundamental to criminal law that “there can be no criminal liability for bad thoughts alone. ...” LaFave and Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 1.2(b) at 10 (1986). I dissent because I conclude that the defendant’s conduct, however ex-ploitive and unfair it may have been, does not fall within the crime of larceny by false pretenses.

1. There was no evidence of a false statement of material fact. The gist of the crime of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Graphic Arts Finishers, Inc. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API