Legal Opinion

Crissman v. . Palmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant appealed from 'the denial of his motion to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered in the cause.

In support of bis motion tbe defendant alleged that tbe judgment sought to be vacated was based upon an erroneous conclusion or mistake as to a fact upon wbicb tbe deed conveying certain mineral rights to tbe defendant was held inadmissible, and that subsequently discovered evidence bad disclosed tbe truth of tbe matter and tbe competency and validity of bis deed.

Tbe circumstances pertinent to defendant’s motion were these: By deed executed 30 June, 1924, there was conveyed to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Skinner v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Menzel v. MenzelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. King v. . RuddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Rierson v. . YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API