Legal Opinion

In re M.G.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2007No. COA07-643PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Respondent mother is the biological mother of M.G. ("Martin") and M.B. ("Michelle"). Respondent father is the biological father of K.R. ("Kristen") and J.R. ("Jack").1 Both respondents appeal from the trial court's order adjudicating all four children abused and neglected.2 We hold that the trial court properly concluded that the four children were abused as defined by N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(1)(b) (2005) and neglected as defined by N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(15). We further affirm the trial court's determination that Kristen was sexually abused under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-101(1)(d).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Jones v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Brewington v. SerratoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. In re D.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re E.G.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. In re M.G.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. In Re MGSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  4. In re K.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. In re: W.C.T., W.J.A.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API