Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Reliance Automobile Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 11, 1913No. Civ. No. 1166PublishedCited by 1 opinion
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action for personal injury. The charging part of plaintiff’s amended complaint is as follows:
“That on the 23d day of October, 1909, plaintiff was in an orchard known as Stanley orchard, Stanley Road near San Leandro, in the county of Alameda, state of California, and was then and there watching the course of the automobile race hereinafter mentioned, which said race was then being held and conducted. That the said orchard marched (sic) upon the highway hereinafter mentioned.
“That on the said date defendant corporation was the owner and in the possession of a certain Knox automobile, and had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Dowell v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Scanlon v. WedgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Bogart v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Frost v. JosselynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Musgrove v. ZobristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947