Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Edmondson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1989No. A89A1285, A89A1286PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellant-plaintiff is an attorney and appellee-defendant is one of his former clients. Appellant filed suit against appellee, seeking to recover the compensation that he had allegedly earned for representing her in various legal matters. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, holding that appellant could not recover either in quantum meruit or for the breach of a contingency contract but, according to the terms of his written express contract, would be limited to a recovery based upon a rate of $65 per hour. Appellant filed a timely notice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fonda Corp. v. Southern Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Willis v. KempCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Matthews v. Neal, Greene & ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Tapley Finance Corp. v. Citizens & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Pérez Marrero v. Colegio de Cirujanos Dentistas de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  3. Terrence Davidson v. Onika MarajCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Life Care Ambulance, Inc. v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Peterson v. First Clayton Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API