Legal Opinion

Horne v. NOBILITY HOMES, INCORPORATED

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 19, 1988No. 8725SC648PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The order from which plaintiff appeals is interlocutory. “An interlocutory order is one made during the pendency of an action, which does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy.” Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 362, 57 S.E. 2d 377, 381, reh'g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E. 2d 429 (1950). Accord McKinney v. Royal Globe Insur. Co., 64 N.C. App. 370, 307 S.E. 2d 390 (1983). An order setting aside a default judgment is interlocutory as “it does not finally dispose of the case and requires…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Fraser v. Di SantiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Leake v. Sunbelt Ltd. of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Ledford v. Asheville Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Duquesne Energy, Inc. v. Shiloh Industrial Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API