Home Packing & Ice Co. v. Cahill
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by William Cahill against the Home Packing and Ice Company and its insurer. From a ruling by the Industrial Board, denying the petition of the Home Packing and Ice Company to set aside an agreement for compensation and ordering a resumption of payments thereunder, the petitioner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.
— On April 1, 1917, the appellee received an injury by accident while at appellants’ industrial plant. Thereafter appellants’ insurance carrier made an investigation of the matter and reported to appellant that appellee was in the .employment of appellant at the time of the accident; that appellee’s injury arose in the course of the employment ; and that his average weekly wage at said time was $35. On November 5, 1917, the parties hereto entered into an agreement as to compensation under §57 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Acts 1915 p. 392, §80201 et seq. Burns ’ Supp. 1918. This…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re StokeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Retmier v. CruseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. Mottley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Indiana University Hospitals v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rodius v. Coeur D'Alene Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. PuckettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.