Legal Opinion
Hardwick v. Kramer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
303 N.Y. 605 (1951)
In the Matter of Robert Hardwick et al., Appellants,
v.
Bernhardt S. Kramer, as City Clerk of The City of Kingston, et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued September 24, 1951.
Decided September 24, 1951
Francis Martocci for appellants.
James G. Connelly, Corporation Counsel, respondent in person and for Bernhardt S. Kramer, as City Clerk of the City of Kingston, respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hardwick v. KramerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Adams v. CuevasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Noonan v. O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Noonan v. O'LearyNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Adams v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Schrader v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.