Legal Opinion

Does 1 through 10 v. Haaland

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided November 5, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00117Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-00117 (WOB-CJS) JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 PLAINTIFFS VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DEBORAH HAALAND, ET AL. DEFENDANTS This matter is before the Court on various motions to dismiss (Docs. 10, 26, 38, 39, 47, 50, 65), a motion to remand by plaintiffs (Doc. 34), and a motion for admission pro hac vice (Doc. 62). The Court has reviewed these motions and concludes that oral argument is unnecessary. Analysis A. Removal The Court first notes that this matter was properly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API