Legal Opinion

Otto v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 2008No. PD-1311-06PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, and KEASLER, JJ., joined.

A jury convicted appellant of felony driving while intoxicated. The issue presented in this case is whether a concurrent-causation jury instruction, that defines intoxication as the “introduction of alcohol, operating either alone or concurrently with an unknown drug,” is substantively different from a jury instruction, that defines intoxication as the “introduction of a combination of alcohol and an unknown drug.” We decide that there is no substantive or legally significant difference between these two charges and that the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Sutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Heard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Otto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crenshaw, Bradley KeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Yzaguirre, Jay PaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Bradley Kelton Crenshaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Bradley Kelton Crenshaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. Bradley Kelton Crenshaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API