Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Inman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2012No. 10-5702PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Brandon Inman, a federal prisoner who pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography, appeals from the district court’s judgment imposing lifetime supervised release and certain conditions of supervised release. The parties waived oral argument, and we unanimously agree that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Because the district court did not articulate a rationale for the length of supervised release and some of the conditions it imposed, we vacate the judgment and remand for re-sentencing.

Inman pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography in violation of…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. David Lee OliverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Craig Alan Swanberg (02-1659) and Adam Elwin Tuimala (02-1836)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Perazza-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. David ZobelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Russell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. SteppCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Kenneth CochraneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Jose Solano-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API