Legal Opinion
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2945, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23952e
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 28, 1992No. 145Published
1Opinion of the Court
173 F.3d 145
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2945,
Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23952E
In re: UNISYS SAVINGS PLAN LITIGATION
John P. Meinhardt, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated
v.
Unisys Corporation (E.D. PA. Civil No. 91-cv-03067).
Bernard McDevitt, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated
v.
Unisys Corporation (E.D. PA. Civil No. 91-cv-03126).
Parker C. Kean, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v.
Unisys Corporation (E.D. PA. Civil No. 91-cv-03164).
Michael Heck; Joseph McCarthy; Angelo Depietro, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated
v.
Unisys…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.