Legal Opinion
Catlett v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 26, 1984No. 78-4061-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT 0. WRIGHT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion filed on behalf of the plaintiff class requesting that a fund be established by the Court to be used-for the purpose of locating class members who are entitled to relief as a result of the finding of liability under Title VII against the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission. In addition, the plaintiffs request that the Highway Commission be ordered to finance this fund.
On April 26, 1982, the Court ordered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b) that this class action sex discrimination suit be severed into separate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Craik v. Minnesota State University BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Ahrens v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Macarz v. Transworld Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus GrowersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
- St. James Community Hospital, Inc. v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Rimmer v. Citifinancial, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.