Legal Opinion

State v. JOST/OREGON-WASHINGTON RECOVERY CO.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. 911510, 911504 CA A72300 (Control), CA A72456PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant Jost owns defendant Oregon-Washington Recovery Co. Inc. (OWR), a company that repossesses automobiles. In connection with Jost’s conduct in repossessing a car, he and OWR were charged with burglary in the second degree, theft in the first degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle. ORS 164.215; ORS 164.055; ORS 164.135. The court granted Jost’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the burglary charge, found OWR not guilty of burglary and convicted both defendants of theft and unauthorized use of a vehicle. Defendants contend that the court erred by denying their motion to suppress and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. DevineOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. PostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API