Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Grant

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case was informally made and settled. Besides the evidence, so far as necessary to a proper understanding of the questions intended to be raised on the appeal, if any portion of it was necessary, it should have contained a statement of the facts as the judge found them, and his conclusions of law. The place for this statement and those conclusions is not in the decision which the judge pronounces and signs as the authority for the judgment; but in the case made to review the judgment. The rules on this subject were laid down in Hunt v. Bloomer (3 Kern., 341) and Johnson v. Whitlock (Id.,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Ingersoll v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Mills v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Doty v. CarolusNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Rice v. IshamNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API