Robertson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
The appellant was convicted for unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
It was the contention of the state that the appellant and one Arthur Haney were engaged in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor at the time of the alleged offense,, and the sheriff, Osborn, testified that on the day of the alleged offense, and also a day or two prior thereto, he observed the appellant at the place where the still was found, apparently stirring the mash, but at the time when he found the still in operation and arrested Haney,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Edgar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Buess v. BuessOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- Clemens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- McIntyre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Enger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Howell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937