Younger v. Pagles
California Supreme Court
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant Pagles in the Twentieth District Court of the County of Santa Cruz. Bebden, J. The judgment was reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
1. The case does not show that the claim to the Eancho Arroyo del Eodeo has been finally confirmed by the authorities of the United States. The Court below found: “On the seventh day of March, 1856, the United States, by the regularly authorized District Attorney, gave regular notice of appeal, upon the part of the United States, from the decision and decree of said District Court to the Supreme Court of the United States. And said cause was regularly appealed by the United States from the said District Court to the Supreme Court of the United States. That thereafter and upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Branson v. CaruthersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Johnson v. DykeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Valentine v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Merrill v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914