Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Canan
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 25, 2000No. IP97-1483-CM/SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on motion for summary judgment of defendants, Dan Canan, Mayor, City of Muncie (the “City”), Joseph Winkle, Chief of Police, and’ the City of Muncie, Indiana (collectively “Defendants”). The Defendants have also filed a motion that the court accept all of Defendants’ statements of material fact as true and uncontroverted pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(g) because the plaintiff, Donald Bailey (“Bailey”), failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Local Rule 56.1(f)(2). In addition, the Defendants…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Braaksma v. Wells Community HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Patton v. Forest River IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020