Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vintimilla v. National Lumber Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 6, 2013No. 12-P-1101Published

1DissentAgnes, J.

We are asked to decide whether the defendant, National Lumber Company (National Lumber), owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, Miguel Vintimilla, who was seriously injured at a construction site when he fell thirty-five feet to the ground from plywood planking that had been placed across the forks of a Lull All Terrain Forklift (forklift). The operator of the forklift was unlicensed. The forklift had been leased by its owner, National Lumber, to Vermont Construction Company (Vermont Construction),1 which employed both the unlicensed operator and the plaintiff. In fact, no one employed *498by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Yakubowicz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. McDonough v. WhalenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API