Legal Opinion

Borgeson v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1938No. 24324. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

Albert E. Borgeson was employed by the Fred Gretsch Manufacturing Company of Chicago as a salesman of musical instruments. In the performance of his duties, he traveled by car through the south and southwest carrying samples with him. In the regular course of his employment he arrived in Chattanooga on the last Saturday of August, 1935, where he made an appointment to call Sunday morning on a local music company. He left his hotel the next morning, got his car containing his samples from the garage and parked it in the street about thirty feet from the hotel, and, after securing his brief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Irwin-Neisler & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mirific Products Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Solar-Sturges Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Danville, Urbana & Champaign Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Illinois Country Club, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Math Igler's Casino, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Krawiec v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Chicago Hardware Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API