Legal Opinion

Mirific Products Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1934No. 22200 Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justicr Orr

delivered the opinion of the court:

John L. Douglas filed a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation act for an alleged accidental injury suffered by him while employed by the Mirific Products Company, a corporation. The /Etna Casualty and Surety Company, which had issued a policy insuring the liability of the Mirific Products Company, was made a party to the application for compensation under section 28 of the act. The arbitrator awarded Douglas compensation for 14-4/7 weeks, aggregating $218.56, for the period of temporary total incapacity, and $1607.85 for necessary first aid,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cuneo Press Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Rittler v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nelson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Math Igler's Casino, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Arbuckle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Chicago Hardware Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API