Legal Opinion

Suddath v. Blanchard & Calhoun

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1929No. 19001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In a suit upon a promissory note wMcIl contains an unconditional and unequivocal promise to pay, but which, also contains a statement that it is given in accordance with the provisions of a certain subscription to stock in the payee corporation and represents a remainder of the purchase-price of the stock, it is not necessary that a copy of the stock subscription should be attached to the petition, or that its contents should otherwise be shown, where a copy of the note itself is attached and it does not appear from the face of that instrument that, the subscription contract embodied any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. English v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Bartow Guano Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Morgan v. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Brantley Co. v. Ocean Steamship Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Chatham Motor Co. v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Porter v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Beadles v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Su v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Greene & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Tomberlin v. Waycross Commercial Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API