Legal Opinion
McCarthy's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 18, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The principles stated and amplified in Brode’s Case, 251 Mass. 414, decided since the hearings before the Industrial Accident Board, indubitably and imperatively require the conclusion that the employee is not entitled to compensation on the facts here disclosed. The case at bar is distinguishable from Hunnewell’s Case, 220 Mass. 351, and Weir’s Case, 252 Mass. 236.
Decree reversed.
Decree to be entered in favor of insurer.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Brode's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Weir's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Panagotopulos's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Casieri's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Hummer's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Ziccardi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Hanson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928