Legal Opinion
Ziccardi's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 12, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. The employee invokes St. 1932, c. 117, amending G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 12. The pertinent facts are that the employee on June 21, 1924, sustained a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Under an agreement he was paid compensation to March 12, 1925, when it was discontinued by order of the board. He filed claim for compensation in April, 1925. It was found by the single member that his condition had no causal relation to his injury. That decision was affirmed by the board on review in August, 1925, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Danforth v. Groton Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Dunbar v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Casieri's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Brode's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- New England Trust Co. v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Campbell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Bernhardt v. Atlantic Finance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.