Legal Opinion

Nassau Insurance v. Ebin

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis Wallach, J.

This motion to stay arbitration of a claim made under a "no-fault” automobile insurance policy raises the principal issue of whether threshold questions relating to conditions precedent to recovery are to be decided by the court or the arbitrators.

Respondent Ramon Cardona is the insured person on a policy of automobile insurance issued by the petitioner. Respondents claim that on May 9, 1974 the insured vehicle was being operated by respondent Flores Cardona when it was struck by another car causing Mr. Cardona to be injured. It is further claimed that respondent Ebin is a physician who…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nassau Insurance v. McMorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Litchsinn v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Zurich Insurance v. EvansCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  4. Country-Wide Insurance v. FrolichCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983
  5. In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API