Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1929No. 6 Div. 219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

This is a bill by property owners and taxpayers, residing within the corporate limits of 'the town of Haleyville, to enjoin the mayor and aldermen of the town from proceeding under certain ordinances to establish a system of sanitary sewerage, and fixing a charge against the property abutting on the streets along which such sewerage system is to be constructed, on the ground that the ordinances have not been legally adopted, and are therefore void.

The jurisdiction qf a court of equity to interfere in a proper case is well settled. Board of Com’rs of City of Mobile et al. v. Moore et al., 214…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Petree v. McMurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Board of Com'rs v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. McIntyre v. McEachernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Odoms v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Chambers v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Methvin v. HaynesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API