Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Seligman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Debt. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The bond in suit was given to the sheriff of Montcalm county to indemnify him against loss, costs, and damages in case he would levy an attachment issued out of the circuit court for the county of Montcalm, wherein Lewis Newbauer, Nathan Newbauer, Edward Newbauer, and Charles Newbauer were plaintiffs, and Louis Simon was defendant, upon certain goods and chattels Avhich appeared to belong to Louis Simon, but which were claimed by Isabella Lewis, of the village of Edmore. The plaintiffs in the attachment suit composed a partnership under the firm name of L. Newbauer & Sons, and their place of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pioneer Iron Co. v. City of NegauneeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Hutchinson v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API