Legal Opinion

Fox v. Norton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Otjowa Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. ~

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy J.:

Was the bond properly admitted in evidence? This is the first and most important question in the case.

The declaration is upon a bond described as the bond of all the defendants below — Charles R. Fox (master of the steamer Empire), Thomas D. Gilbert and Francis B. Gilbert, sealed with their respective seals — and the obligation to pay is described as the joint obligation of all.

The bond offered in evidence describes the obligors as Charles R. Fox (present master of the steamer Empire), and Gilbert & Co., and is conditioned that the said Charles R. Fox, and Gilbert & Co. shall…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  2. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
  3. Palmer v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wilcox v. DodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883
  5. Koch v. EndrissMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API