Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Garbutt v. Lafarnara

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 6, 2001No. SC99-53Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

I do not believe that the certified question has been answered by Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc., 766 So.2d 1010 (Fla.2000). Murphy involved a case of unobjected-to closing argument at trial. The Court in Murphy concluded that in order for a civil litigant to seek relief in the appellate court, the litigant must have “at least challenged such argument in the trial court by way of a motion for new trial even if no objection was voiced during trial.” Id. at 1027. Thus, the standard we enunciated in Murphy was based on a lack of objection to the closing argument prior to the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Johnson v. EmersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Garbutt v. LaFarnaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Siler v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API