Legal Opinion

Hall v. Meyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is a suit in equity in which plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendant’s interference with an alleged easement to take water from a spring on defendant’s land and to recover damages for defendant’s interference with the easement. The trial court entered a decree declaring plaintiffs the owners of an estate in fee simple in the spring and awarding damages in the amount of $451. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiffs rest their claim to the spring waters upon the following series of conveyances. Prior to 1956, Martin Peterson owned a tract of land bisected by a county road running north and south. In that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruhnke v. AubertOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Skinner v. SilverOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sweetland v. Grants Pass Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verzeano v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Luevano v. Group OneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Farnsworth v. Meadowland Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Hanneman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Sunset Lake Water Service District v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API