Legal Opinion

Frissell v. Frissell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 8010DC37PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The question raised on this appeal is whether plaintiff waived his right to a jury trial on the issue of permanent alimony. The district court, in its order denying plaintiffs motion to vacate the permanent alimony order, concluded as a matter of law that plaintiff had waived his right to a jury trial by his failure to appear, either personally or by counsel, when the issue of permanent alimony was decided by the district court.

Plaintiff insists there was no waiver of jury trial and relies upon Heidler v. Heidler, 42 N.C. App. 481, 256 S.E. 2d 833 (1979). In Heidler,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Heidler v. HeidlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. ERVIN COMPANY v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. MorozewychAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Morrio v. AsbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Seraph Garrison, LLC v. GarrisonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API