Legal Opinion

Heidler v. Heidler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7821DC1038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s failure to submit issues of fact to a jury. The plaintiff contends that this failure constituted reversible error because plaintiff had not given his consent to the withdrawal of defendant’s jury trial demand as required by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 38(d). We agree and reverse.

Rule 38(d) provides:

Waiver. — Except in actions wherein jury trial cannot be waived, the failure of a party to serve a demand as required by this rule and file it as required by Rule 5(d) constitutes a waiver by him of trial by jury. A demand for trial by jury as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. MorozewychAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frissell v. FrissellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Isaac v. McMorrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Morrio v. AsbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API