Legal Opinion
MacK v. R. C. Motor Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 16, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-1265PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHAPMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the defendant’s motion for summary judgment claiming that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy and relief is under the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act (Title 72 Code of Laws of South Carolina 1962, as amended,) and that jurisdiction is vested solely in the Industrial Commission of the State of South Carolina and not in this Court.
Under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- James M. Walker v. United States Gypsum Company, and Third-Party and Coley & Peterson, Incorporated, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Boseman v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. HonakerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Carlos A. Singleton and Shelby Singleton v. J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Huntington and Guerry Electric Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Singleton v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1982
- Dickerson v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983