Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1944No. Appeal, 193PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Patteeson,

Eobert A. Ellis, appellant, was indicted and tried for burglary under Section 901 of the Act of 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS Section 4901, which provides: “Whoever, at any time, wilfully and maliciously, enters any building, with intent to commit any felony therein, is guilty of burglary ...” A jury returned a verdict of guilty of “an attempt to break and enter building with the intent to commit rape.” 1 A motion for a directed verdict was refused. No request was made for a new trial. Appeal was taken to the Superior Court, which court affirmed the court below, two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. NeubauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Garison v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API