Legal Opinion
Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 19, 1999No. 91 Civ. 4544(MGC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants Fendi USA, Inc. and Fendi Stores, Inc. (together, “Fendi”) move In limine to preclude the proposed testimony of Dov Frishberg, Ph.D. at the trial of this action. Plaintiff Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. (“Fashion Boutique”) proffers the testimony of Dr. Frishberg as an expert to testify on the lost value of Fashion Boutique’s retail business when Fashion Boutique closed that business in 1991. For the reasons discussed below, Fendi’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
It is undisputed that plaintiff operated a retail store in a shopping mall in Short…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- John F. Meehan and Robert W. Fink A/K/A Meehan & Fink v. John Snow and Judy SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Securitron Magnalock Corp. v. SchnabolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Matherson v. MarchelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bose Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi Usa, Inc., and Fendi Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Verizon Directories Corp. v. Yellow Book USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. NdhiaOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. National Dairy Herd Improvement Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Boule v. HuttonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.