Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 7, 1994No. 92-1292PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
510 U.S. 569 (1994)
CAMPBELL, AKA SKYYWALKER, ET AL.
v.
ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC, INC.
No. 92-1292.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 9, 1993.
Decided March 7, 1994.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
2Opinion of the Court · SouterSouter, J.
KENNEDY, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 596.
Bruce S. Rogow argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Alan Mark Turk.
Sidney S. Rosdeitcher argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter L. Felcher and Stuart M. Cobert.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · SouterJustice Souter
We are called upon to decide whether 2 Live Crew's commercial parody of Roy Orbison's song, "Oh,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
4Cases cited23 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stewart v. AbendSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
5Cited by1 opinion
- Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016