Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 4, 2013No. 2:10-CR-8-FLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.

Five motions to dismiss, fully briefed, and on which, with one exception, oral argument was received December 12, 2012, come now before the court.1 These include motion directed to count one of the indictment, alleging a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (DE # 238), joined in by all five defendants, including Gary Jackson (“Jackson”), William Wheeler Mathews, Jr. (“Mathews”), Andrew Howell *695(“Howell”), Ronald Slezak (“Slezak”), and Ana Bundy (“Bundy”). Motion to dismiss counts two through six of the indictment, alleging repeated violations of 18…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eric Jordan v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  2. Graham v. USA-2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  3. United States v. SaffariniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API