Legal Opinion

Haralambie v. Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 27, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, have brought this appeal challenging the trial court’s granting of appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We believe the granting of the motion was proper and affirm.

Appellants, members of the State Bar of Arizona, were appointed in 1978 by the Juvenile Court of Pima County to represent minor children and the natural father in a dependency proceeding and in a termination of parental rights proceeding. As compensation for this representation, the judge who had appointed appellants and who presided over the proceedings by minute entry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Tribe v. Shell Oil Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Independent National Bank v. Westmoor Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Pinal County Board of Supervisors v. Georgini and T.J.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API