Legal Opinion

Pinal County Board of Supervisors v. Georgini and T.J.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 2014No. 2 CA-SA 2014-0010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

OPINION

¶ 1 In this special action, the Pinal County Board of Supervisors challenges the respondent judge’s appointment of the Pinal County Public Defender’s Office (the PCPD), or any counsel at public expense, to represent real party in interest T.J. in a proceeding pursuant to AR.S. § 13-925, to restore her right to possess firearms. We accept jurisdiction because the Board has no “equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal,” Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 1(a), and because the issue is purely legal, of statewide importance, and not previously addressed by Arizona…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. State v. PetramalaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API