Legal Opinion
In re the Recall of Reed
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 2005No. 76758-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*55¶1 Appellants Martin D. Ringhofer and Linda Jordan seek direct review of the Thurston County Superior Court’s ruling that their recall petition was factually and legal insufficient. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court.
2Per curiam
I. Facts and Procedural History
¶2 Appellant Ringhofer submitted a statement of charges on January 19, 2005 with the Office of the Secretary of State seeking the recall of Secretary of State Sam Reed. On January 24, 2005, appellant Linda Jordan filed supplemental charging materials with the secretary of state. Appellants set forth nine charges that allege a basis…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Recall of AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Recall of BoldtWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- In Re Recall of ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re Recall of InsleeWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- In re the Petition for the Recall of HeibergWashington Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.