Legal Opinion

Federal Life Insurance v. Summergill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1932No. 22014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Stephens, J.

1. The term “medical or surgical attention” in questions propounded to the applicant for a sick-benefit insurance policy, as to whether he had received “medical or surgical attention within the past five years,” means medical or surgical attention for some illness or disease of substantial importance or of a serious nature, and not consultation, treatment, or attendance concerning some trivial or temporary indisposition or feeling which has passed away without affecting the general health. Crosby v. Security Mutual Life Ins. Co., 86 App. Div. 89 (83 N. Y. Supp. 140) ; Couch on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crosby v. Security Mutual Life IunsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. New York Life Insurance v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Southern Life Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API