Legal Opinion

Meigs v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 6, 1939No. 6566PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover income taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected. All payments, returns, claims for refund and other action prerequisite to this suit have been duly made and filed in due season, and the proper time has elapsed after the filing of such claims to enable the plaintiff to sue. The plaintiff contends that compensation received by him from the Pondville State Cancer Hospital was not taxable under the Revenue Act since the hospital was an agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision thereof engaged in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Cook v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Medical Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API